top of page
Writer's pictureCharles Miller

Few posts after a long hiatus (2 of 4) - $AD8

This is not investment advice and does not consider your financial situation. Do your research before taking any positions in the securities listed below.


#2 $AD8 - Ignoring the recent drawdown in share price, what needs to happen for this share price to make sense

Overview

  • In the financial press, the main headlines on $AD8 have focused on a) the sharp fall in the $AD8 share price given their weak guidance for H2'24 b) the poor optics around insider sales before a share issuance and c) how the business will be a multiple of the size if it can penetrate the video market

  • For this article, I think item (c) is the only thing that matters in the long term and the valuation prospects.

Why you should even consider this business

  • Safe to assume a 5-6% CAGR for this sector ($325bn to $433bn between 2024-29)

  • Market share is c.9% as at 2024

  • By a reminder:

    • Dante sells in two functions either via

      • $AD8 Chips to accompany OEM-made chips with product development software as well as either (a) free application Dante Controller & (b) paid for Dante Domain manager

      • Standalone $AD8 chips where they do not need to include OEM chips. They break it down as follows:

        • Higher-priced is suitable for higher channel counts - Brooklyn

        • Medium channel-count - Broadway

        • Low-priced & low channel count - Ultimo (typically for speakers and microphones).

  • This is set out below

Drivers for this Business

  • $AD8 is not the most complicated business, but there are a lot of datapoints you can observe which are a waste of time.The way I look at it is:

    • What is $AD8's penetration in the market (instead of focusing on overall TAM growth)

    • How many units have been shipped (noting inventory levels change)

    • Revenue per unit

    • Any other opex/balance sheet factors impacting the valuation of the business.

  • Here is an excerpt of the financials to date (I have run my own forecasts below)

  • As you can see there are some apparent trends in future growth

    • Revenue per unit for video is way larger than Audio

    • Number of shipping OEMs is way smaller (and so is the addressable market)

    • Growth rates for Audio/Software have stabilised so that should not be the focus of the valuation

How to value $AD8

  • Unimportant items

    • Restocking/destocking in OEMs - Whilst obviously a P&L driver is one-off so I wouldn't put much value here nor would I ascribe much value to discontinuation of software (e.g. Viper) is unimportant in my mind

    • Multiple expansion potentional - Whether the Video business will command a higher video multiple; this would be "nice to have" but video is very nascent

    • Level of R&D capex - this will run at about 20% in the long run so a drop/lift in a period is not something I focus on

    • Cash balance - yes they have a good cash runway (over $100m) but this is not the main valuation driver; you're still valuing $650m of asset after net cash balance

  • Items to observe

    • LTIP- Challenges in meeting long-term incentive targets, requiring around 50% growth by FY26 to achieve the minimum hurdle. My concern is whether this is their LTIP is out of the money leads to staff attrition

    • M&A They have walked away from 2x deals in 2024 (not necessarily a bad thing). However, there will be pressure on the newly hired Chief Strategy Officer to get runs on the board. My fear is they burn their $100m cash kitty on video tech deals to get their LTIP

    • Costs Management: Management noted that opex will grow by 7-9%, an improvement from the >28% p.a. over the past three years. If they can genuinely extract higher operational leverage, today's share price could be more reasonable

  • Key valuation assumptions

    • Growing penetration: There are some easy assumptions to make:

      • Audio penetration will increase from 55% to >65%

      • Software sales, after adjusting for Viper will grow at a slowish rate

The tough assumption is around video penetration growing from 21% to 48% or from 30k units to >85k units and here is where the whole thesis falls down - to achieve a c.$10.5-$11.5/share price that you would hope for, you need to assume a doubling of video units & I simply do not know the competitive landscape for the video product and this seems like a stretch

  • Expense management: Offsetting this, I do see a scenario where Employee expenses are lower (c.40% of revenue), Admin Expenses come down and EBITDA margin grows to say mid-20%; which is a key focus of management - as seen in the management pack below:

Conclusion: Whilst I genuinely think this is an appealing business (founder led, leader in fragmented space). My largest issue is:

  • I think it is bullish to assume their Video Revenue reaches $15m by 2028 which is still only 10% of revenue

  • Running reasonable growth to 2028, I can imagine revenue reaches $140m and EBITDA of $35m

  • Given today's EV is c.$660m - you essentially have to wait 4yrs to get a <18x EBITDA

Despite all the favourable press about the fall in the share price, I think this company is worth an EV of c.$500m (unless there are huge operational efficiencies obtained to assume a higher EBITDA margin going forward)


13 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page